CPLUOS Astrophysics team meeting

Asia/Seoul
물리학과

물리학과

Zoom Meeting https://uos-ac-kr.zoom.us/j/8264902652 Meeting ID: 826 490 2652
Description

https://uos-ac-kr.zoom.us/j/8264902652

    • 14:00 15:00
      COSMOLOGY
      • 14:00
        Hyeonmo's Report - Head-on Collsion of FDM/CDM Halos(POSTER) 10m
        Speaker: Hyeonmo Koo (University of Seoul)

        Head-on Collision of Fuzzy/Cold Dark Matter Halos

        • Abstract
        • Collision of Fuzzy Dark Matter Halos
        • Collision of Cold Dark Matter Halos
        • Results & Theoretical Interpretation
          • The appearance of some bumps in ΔvCDM is due to the interference as head-on collision of two halos which has the characteristic time scale, the period for oscillating r1/2.
        • -34 ~ 0 ~ 34 → -20 ~ 0 ~ 20 because of wide [kpc]
        • FDM profile spreads over, while CDM profile is concentrated. Of course, it might be just a visual misconception, because the density profile from CDM cannot reconstruct low-dense region due to the lack of mass particle. This is one of the main reason why he should draw only sufficiently dense region for both FDM and CDM.
        • As a result, FDM profile and CDM profile should be calculated with high density in dense area.
      • 14:10
        Young's report. FoF and MST algorithm 10m
        Speaker: Young Ju

        Mulguisin Clustering Algorithm I. Comparison of Clustering Algorithms for Study of Cosmic Structure Finding

        • What is the cluster? → We need Cluster finding algorithm
        • MulGuiSin algorithm
          • We propose a new cluster finding algorithm, MulGuiSin(MGS)
        • Schematic idea of MGS
          • 1. MGS with different height hide into the water tank
          • 2. We drain water from the water tank
          • 3. The highest MGS first appears
          • 4. As draining consecutively, the next highest MGS appears
          • 4. Keep draining until there is no remained MGS
          • → The MGS trace galaxies top-bottom approach
        • MGS algorithm
          • 1. FInd galaxy with the highest density
          • 2. The galaxy becomes a new cluster, "MGS"
          • 3. FInd the next galaxy with second highest density and estimate the distance between "MGS" and next galaxy
          • 4. If the distance is less than our criteria, the second galaxy is merged with "MGS"
          • 5. This process continues until there is no galaxy
        • Features of MGS algorithm
          • 1. MGS can find structure from galaxy data in detail
          • 2. Provide topological information
            • Number of nodes
            • Number of branches
            • Number of children
            • Link length
            • Average node generation
            • ...
        • What is the difference between MGS and other algorithm?
          • Traditional algorithm : FoF (Friends of Friends)
          • Graph based algorithm : MST (Minimum spanning tree)
          • Machine learning (ML) algorithm :  DBSCAN (Density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise)
        • Performance test
          • We test performance of MGS :
          • Test : How many cluster are returned
          • 1. 2 controlled data
            • a. simple gaussian model
            • b. power-law model & noise
          • 2. Comparing with other algorithms - FoF, MST, DBSCAN
          • Controlled data 1 : simple gaussian model
            • Check the number of clusters with changing linking-length
          • Controlled data 2 : power-law model
            • 50 halos ; 7041 galaxies
            • MGS find well number of cluster when linking length > 4
            • MST find less number of cluster than MGS
            • FoF and DBSCAN is similar with MST
            • Several cluster is very close to each other, other algorithms find some cluster to one giant cluster
          • Controlled data 2 : power-law model & noise
            • Add the noise into the controlled data 2
            • We check number of clusters changing with linking-length
            • The minimum member of cluster is 50
            • MGS find well number of cluster when linking length > 4
            • MST, FoF and DBSCAN find less number of cluster than MGS
            • Several cluster are very close to each other, other algorithms find some cluster to one giant cluster
            • For linking length > 12, the number of cluster in larger than 50 for MGS
            • Lots of noise become cluster, while the other algorithm make one giant cluster
            • In the high noise, the more noise become new clusters
            • In contrast, the other algorithms make one giant cluster
            • This shows that the MGS is very different algorithm comparing with other 3 algorithms
            • In the beginning, we introduce that MGS find cluster in detail
            • The other algorithms find cluster as one giant cluster when linking length is large
            • In contrast, the MGS always trace structure of cluster. They do not make one giant cluster
            • It is very different feature comparing with other algorithms
        • Conclusion
          • We propose a new cluster finding algorithm MGS
          • The MGS shows good performance in the controlled data comparing with other algorithms
          • MGS can provide lots of topological information, it can give us other perspective of research for large-scale structure
      • 14:20
        Hannah's Report 10m

        See the slides from 8p

        Speaker: Hannah Jhee (University of Seoul)

        Tracking Halo Orbits and Their Mass Evolution around the Large-scale Filaments

        • 1. Motivation
        • 2. Data and Method
        • 3. Results
          • 3.1. Trajectories in the Phase-space
          • 3.2. Virialization of Halos
          • 3.3. Mass Evolution of Halos
          • 3.4. Mass segregation
            • Massive halos arrive earlier, less massive later
              • The fraction of massive halos is lower when farther from the filaments
              • Massive crosser halos lose their kinetic energy and sink in(consistent with observation)
                • 1. Due to mass evol. in filaments?
                • 2. Due to arrivals of less-massive halos?
        • 4. Summary
          • 1. Halos show a similar trajectory in perpendicular phase-space.
          • 2. Halos are virialized in filament environments after al least 6 Gyr since the first pericenter crossing.
          • 3. Halos grow in mass as they approach filaments, and will lose mass if the environment is harsh enough.
          • 4. Mass segregation of halos around the filaments in mostly caused by massive halos approaching faster than less massive ones, and dynamical friction plays a role for crossers.
      • 14:30
        CHOA(Cosmology of High-Order Statistics) (Poster with CLML, NPCF) 10m
        Speaker: Sumi Kim (University of Seoul)
      • 14:40
        CLML 10m

        Cosmology with Large scale structure using Machine Learning

        Speaker: Se Yeon Hwang

        Comparing Cosmological Information from Deep Learning and Higher Order Statistics

        • Abstract
        • Data
        • CNN(Convolutional Neural Networks) model
        • Deep Learning Result
        • Correlation Function Result
        • Comparison : DL vs N-PCF
      • 14:50
        Dr.Sabiu's Report - N-PCF 10m
        Speaker: Dr Cristiano Sabiu (University of Seoul)
    • 15:00 15:10
      Discussion 10m