CPLUOS Astrophysics team meeting

Asia/Seoul
물리학과

물리학과

Zoom Meeting https://uos-ac-kr.zoom.us/j/8264902652 Meeting ID: 826 490 2652
Description

https://uos-ac-kr.zoom.us/j/8264902652

    • COSMOLOGY
      • 1
        Hyeonmo's Report - Head-on Collsion of FDM/CDM Halos(POSTER)
        Speaker: Hyeonmo Koo (University of Seoul)

        Head-on Collsion of FDM/CDM Halos(POSTER)

        • lnΛ → That is not precise.
      • 2
        Young's report. FoF and MST algorithm
        Speaker: Young Ju

        FoF and MST algorithm

        • Mulguisin Clustering Algorithm I. Comparison of Clustering Algorithms for Study of Cosmic Structure Finding
        • We need Cluster finding algorithm.
        • Cluster finding algorithms
          • What is the differences of FoF, MST, and DBSCAN?
            • Traditional algorithm : FoF(Friends of Friends)
            • Graph based algorithms : MST(Minimum spanning tree)
            • Machine learning(ML) algorithm : DBSCAN(Density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise)
        • We propose new cluster finding algorithm, MulGuiSin(MGS)
        • Schematic idea of MGS
          • 1. MGS with different height hide into the water tank.
          • 2. We drain water from the water tank.
          • 3. The highest MGS first appears.
          • 4. As draining consecutively, the next highest MGS appears.
          • 4. Keep draining until there is no remained MGS
          • → The MGS trace galaxies top-bottom approach.
        • MGS algorithm
          • 1. Find galaxy with the highest density.
          • 2. The galaxy becomes a new cluster, "MGS".
          • 3. Find the next galaxy with second highest density and estimate the distance between "MGS" and next galaxy.
          • 4. If the distance is less than out criteria, the second galaxy is merged with "MGS".
          • 5. This process continues until there is no galaxy.
        • Features of MGS algorithm
          • 1. MGS can find structure from galaxy data in detail.
          • 2. Provide topological information
            • Number of nodes
            • Number of branches
            • Number of children
            • Link length
            • Average node generation
            • ...
        • Performance test
          • Controlled data 1 : Simple gaussian model
            • Limit of Linking-length : 4
              • Because of the meger of data
          • Controlled data 2 : Power-law model
          • Controlled data 3 : Halo mass function + NFW profile
        • Conclusion
          • We propose new cluster finding algorithm MGS.
          • The MGS shows good performance in the test data set.
          • MGS can provide lots of topological information, it  can give us other perspective of research for large-scale structure.
      • 3
        Hannah's Report

        See the slides from 8p

        Speaker: Hannah Jhee (University of Seoul)

        Tracking Halo Orbits and Their Mass Evolution around the Large-scale Filaments

      • 4
        CHOA(Cosmology of High-Order Statistics)
        Speaker: Sumi Kim (University of Seoul)

        CHOA(Cosmology of High-Order Statistics)

        • Pinocchio halo catalogue data → 3 - point correlation function(input) → Relatively Simple Machine Learning → Ω_m, σ_8(output)
        • Decision Tree
          • The goal is to sperate the classes using data's features.
          • In each node input data is seperated into N different subnodes.
          • Depth of tree = Number of questions
        • Random Forest
          • Set of many individual decision trees.
          • Class with most votes becomes prediction.
          • Large uncorrelated model performs better than individual trees.
          • Gets sample of data but the same size.
          • Origianl = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
          • Sample = [1, 2, 3, 3, 5, 5]
        • 3pcf of different cosmologies
          • Ω_m = 0.16, σ_8 = 0.40(output)
          • Ω_m = 0.26, σ_8 = 0.40(output)
          • Ω_m = 0.26, σ_8 = 1.10(output)
        • Test in 'different cosmology' data
          • Random Forest result is slightly better in constraint.
        • Mid - term inspection in 'single cosmology' data
          • 3 - point correlation function & Deep learning using mass and mass weighted velocity
          • → It's not fair comparison due to the scale. We expect deep learning will win if using full size.
        • For Next
          • Planning to stick 3pcf + 2pcf togother and use it as input.
          • Can compare with this result.
      • 5
        CLML

        Cosmology with Large scale structure using Machine Learning

        Speaker: Se Yeon Hwang
      • 6
        Dr.Sabiu's Report - N-PCF
        Speaker: Dr Cristiano Sabiu (University of Seoul)
    • 7
      Discussion